Why All The Resistance To More Vaccine Research

Why All The Resistance To More Vaccine Research

For anyone who has had a family member or friend who struggles with autism, it’s hard for us to understand the resistance society seems to have to making sure there is no link between vaccines and the condition.

People cite study after study, but don’t look at who did the study, how the study was done, and most importantly, who funded it.

In California, one in eight boys will be diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.

Nationwide, the numbers have also skyrocketed. 

Back when you and I were kids, the statistics show very few cases.

And it’s not that awareness is up; the number of cases is what’s up.

U.S. Secretary of Health Robert Kennedy expresses deep skepticism about the current state of vaccine studies, arguing they are inadequate and often conflicted by industry ties.

Kennedy also cites Placebo-controlled trials: Kennedy advocates for the use of inert placebo-controlled trials for all new vaccines, a significant departure from current practices, where new vaccines are often tested against existing, approved vaccines (as withholding a known effective vaccine for a deadly disease is considered unethical). He has stated that "placebo-controlled trials are gold-standard science" and believes that without them, the risk profiles of childhood vaccines are largely unknown.

How did the vaccine program become such a sacred cow for so many?

Why is the vaccine program immune to questioning?

It’s untouchable and sacred to promoters, but when you start looking at what is being pumped into our children’s veins, wouldn’t more testing, to be sure vaccines are safe, sound prudent? 

Kennedy argues that there’s a conflict of interest with the medical experts who have historically advised the government on vaccine policy, such as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), who have conflicts of interest due to financial ties to pharmaceutical companies

HELLO, does that not raise a red flag for you?

If we discovered the sugar in gummy bears or the red dye in Fruit Loops cereal might be causing something as devastating as autism, would we as a country be screaming for more studies?

If there were evidence that gas-powered vehicles or carbon could be linked to autism, there would be no studies.

You’d see legislation forced on the population and regulations imposed immediately. 

But somehow, the vaccine is sacred to those who have never had a child or relative changed by autism.

You haven’t had someone you love, normal one day and the next, forever changed. 

This is not about whether vaccines are good or bad.

More studies do not tell you that you are doing the wrong thing or that those of us who question vaccines are right.

This is to do the best studies we can, without the ties to the vaccine makers, so we can “DETERMINE” whether vaccines play or role, or not. 

No one’s taking away your choice, but quit taking away ours as you refuse to even consider, vaccines might be part of what’s destroying so many lives.